<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>London Poetry Review &#187; T.S. Kerrigan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://londonpoetryreview.com/author/t-s-kerrigan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://londonpoetryreview.com</link>
	<description>Britain&#039;s leading publication dedicated to traditional poetry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:53:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DE AMORIS NATURA</title>
		<link>http://londonpoetryreview.com/2009/03/de-amoris-natura/</link>
		<comments>http://londonpoetryreview.com/2009/03/de-amoris-natura/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T.S. Kerrigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vol. 2, No. 1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newformalistpress.com/londonpoetryreview.com/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cherie, don&#8217;t ask if love is true, Its painful deprivations fair. What seven scholars ever knew Why lovers care or cease to care? Don&#8217;t think of love as some disease (The product of a spell or curse According to Hippocrates) Which only passion can reverse. Don&#8217;t theorize that love is just, Which changes with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cherie, don&rsquo;t ask if love is true,<br />
Its painful deprivations fair.<br />
What seven scholars ever knew<br />
Why lovers care or cease to care? </p>
<p>Don&rsquo;t think of love as some disease<br />
(The product of a spell or curse<br />
According to Hippocrates)<br />
Which only passion can reverse.</p>
<p>Don&rsquo;t theorize that  love is just,<br />
Which changes with a lover&rsquo;s eyes,<br />
Or seek to forge a bond with trust,<br />
If bondage ends in love&rsquo;s demise.</p>
<p>Don&rsquo;t grow incensed as loved ones age;<br />
Love&rsquo;s for the spirit, not the eye.<br />
What god would bear a lover&rsquo;s rage?<br />
Complain of love and watch it die.</p>
<p>And never think of love as good<br />
Or anything but free and wild.<br />
The thing that&rsquo;s most misunderstood:<br />
The God of Love is just a child.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://londonpoetryreview.com/2009/03/de-amoris-natura/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
